Peer-reviewed publications:

Gianclaudio Malgieri, Automated decision-making in the EU Member States: The right to explanation and other “suitable safeguards” in the national legislations, Computer Law & Security Review, Volume 35, Issue 5, 2019,105327, ISSN 0267-3649, DOI 10.1016/j.clsr.2019.05.002.

de Miguel Beriain, I. Should we have a right to refuse diagnostics and treatment planning by artificial intelligence?. Med Health Care and Philos 23, 247–252 (2020). DOI 10.1007/s11019-020-09939-2

Eldar Haber, Aurelia Tamò-Larrieux, Privacy and security by design: Comparing the EU and Israeli approaches to embedding privacy and security, Computer Law & Security Review, Volume 37, 2020, 105409, ISSN 0267-3649, DOI 10.1016/j.clsr.2020.105409

Gianclaudio Malgieri, Data protection and research: A vital challenge in the era of COVID-19 pandemic, Computer Law & Security Review, Volume 37, 2020, 105431, ISSN 0267-3649, DOI 10.1016/j.clsr.2020.105431.

Denise Amram, Building up the “Accountable Ulysses” model. The impact of GDPR and national implementations, ethics, and health-data research: Comparative remarks, Computer Law & Security Review, Volume 37, 2020,105413, ISSN 0267-3649, DOI 10.1016/j.clsr.2020.105413.

Dara Hallinan, The genomic data deficit: On the need to inform research subjects of the informational content of their genomic sequence data in consent for genomic research, Computer Law & Security Review, Volume 37, 2020, 105427, ISSN 0267-3649, DOI 10.1016/j.clsr.2020.105427.

Arianna Rossi, Gabriele Lenzini, Transparency by design in data-informed research: A collection of information design patterns, Computer Law & Security Review, Volume 37, 2020, 105402, ISSN 0267-3649, DOI 10.1016/j.clsr.2020.105402 ()

Gianclaudio Malgieri, J?drzej Niklas, Vulnerable data subjects, Computer Law & Security Review, Volume 37, 2020, 105415, ISSN 0267-3649,

Iñigo de Miguel, Elena Atienza-Macías WHAT CAN WE EXPECT FROM THE EU LEGAL FRAMEWORK IN A PANDEMIC OUTBREAK? BioLaw Journal, 2020, ISSN 2284-4503 DOI: 10.15168/2284-4503-20201s .

de Miguel Beriain, I., & Pérez Estrada, M. J. (2020). La inteligencia artificial en el proceso penal español: un analisis de su admisibilidad sobre la base de los derechos fundamentales implicados. Revista De Derecho De La UNED (RDUNED), (25), 531–561. DOI 10.5944/rduned.25.2019.27013

de Miguel Beriain, I. Medicina personalizada, algoritmos predictivos y utilización de sistemas de decisión automatizados en asistencia sanitaria. Problemas éticos. DILEMATA – International Journal of Applied Ethics, Issue Year 11 – No 30 (May 2019), 2019, ISSN 1989-7022

de Miguel Beriain I., Timo, M., Chortara T., Duardo-Sánchez, A., Feeney O., Felzmann, H., Fernández de Uzquiano, E., Lievevrouw, E., Marelli, L., Mattsson, T., Pulice, E., Lúcia Raposo, V., Robienski, J., Penasa, S., Van Hoyweghen, I., Rothmar HJ., An EU comparative analysis of the regulation of clinical trials supervisory bodies in the aftermath of Regulation 536/2014. European Public Law, 2020, Volume 26, Issue 2 (2020) pp. 307 – 330, ISSN 1354-3725

Íñigo de Miguel Beriain, The Geneva Statement on Heritable Human Genome Editing: A Criticism, Trends in Biotechnology, Volume 39, Issue 3, 2021, Pages 219-220, ISSN 0167-7799, DOI 10.1016/j.tibtech.2020.11.004.

de Miguel Beriain, I. Gene editing and disabled people: a response to Felicity Boardman. J Community Genet 11, 241–243 (2020). DOI 10.1007/s12687-020-00460-w

De Miguel Beriain, I., Jove, Daniel, Is it possible to place limits on the self-determination of your own genetic data? Certainly, and there is an urgent need for it! Online First – BLJ 1S/21. 20 Dec 2020.

De Miguel Beriain, I., Lazcoz Moratinos, G., Sanz Echevarría, M B., Machine learning in the EU health care context: exploring the ethical, legal and social issues. Information, Communication & Society 23(8) : 1139-1153 (2020). DOI 10.1080/1369118X.2020.1719185

Iñigo de Miguel Beriain, We should not vaccinate the young to protect the old: a response to Giubilini, Savulescu, and Wilkinson, Journal of Law and the Biosciences, Volume 8, Issue 1, January-June 2021, lsab015, DOI 10.1093/jlb/lsab015

De Miguel Beriain Í, Rueda J. Vaccination certificates, immunity passports, and test-based travel licences: Ethical, legal, and public health issues. Travel Med Infect Dis. 2021 May 8; 42:102079. doi: 10.1016/j.tmaid.2021.102079. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 33971334.

Mateja Durovic, Franciszek Lech, ‘A Consumer Law Perspective on the Commercialization of Data‘, (2021), 29, European Review of Private Law, Issue 5, pp. 701-732.

Gemma Minero Alejandre, ‘Ownership Of Databases: Personal Data Protection And Intellectual Property Rights On Databases‘, (2021), 29, European Review of Private Law, Issue 5, pp. 733-756.

Bart Van Der Sloot, ‘The Quality of Life: Protecting Non-personal Interests and Non-personal Data in the Age of Big Data’, (2021), 29, European Review of Private Law, Issue 5, pp. 757-784.

Iñigo de Miguel Beriain, Aliuska Duardo-Sánchez, José Castillo Parrilla, ‘What Can We Do with the Data of Deceased People? A Normative Proposal‘, (2021), 29, European Review of Private Law, Issue 5, pp. 785-806.

José Antonio Castillo Parrilla, ‘The Legal Regulation of Digital Wealth: Commerce, Ownership and Inheritance of Data‘, (2021), 29, European Review of Private Law, Issue 5, pp. 807-830.

Tronnier, F., Pape, S., Löbner, S., Rannenberg, K. (2022). A Discussion on Ethical Cybersecurity Issues in Digital Service Chains. In: Ko?odziej, J., Repetto, M., Duzha, A. (eds) Cybersecurity of Digital Service Chains. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13300. Springer, Cham.

?as, J., De Hert, P., Porcedda, M. G. and Raab, C. D., 2022, Introduction to the Special Issue: Questioning Modern Surveillance Technologies: Ethical and Legal Challenges of Emerging Information and Communication Technologies, Information Polity 27, 121-129 .

Orrù, E., 2022, The European PNR Directive as an instance of pre-emptive, risk-based algorithmic security and its implications for the regulatory framework, Information Polity 27, 131-146 .

Barkane, I., 2022, Questioning the EU proposal for an Artificial Intelligence Act: The need for prohibitions and a stricter approach to biometric surveillance, Information Polity 27, 147-162.

Gremsl, T. and Hödl, E., 2022, Emotional AI: Legal and ethical challenges, Information Polity 27, 163-174.

Clarke, R., 2022, Responsible application of artificial intelligence to surveillance: What prospects?, Information Polity 27, 175-191.

De Hert, P. and Bouchagiar, G., 2022, Visual and biometric surveillance in the EU. Saying ‘no’ to mass surveillance practices?, Information Polity 27, 193-217.

Eneman, M., Ljungberg, J., Raviola, E. and Rolandsson, B., 2022, The sensitive nature of facial recognition: Tensions between the Swedish police and regulatory authorities, Information Polity 27, 219-232.

Urquhart, L., Miranda, D. and Podoletz, L., 2022, Policing the smart home: The internet of things as ‘invisible witnesses’, Information Polity 27, 233-246.

Pedrozo, S. and Klauser, F., 2022, Between formality and informality: A critical study of the integration of drones within the Neuchâtel police force, Information Polity 27, 247-258.

Eliot, D. and Murakami Wood, D., 2022, Culling the FLoC: Market forces, regulatory regimes and Google’s (mis)steps on the path away from targeted advertising, Information Polity 27, 259-274.

Rudschies, C., 2022, Power in the modern ‘surveillance society’: From theory to methodology, Information Polity 27, 275-289.

Marx, G. T., 2022, An essay on complex problems and simple solutions: Techno-fallacies of the information age, Information Polity 27, 291-304.

“Humans in the GDPR and AIA governance of automated and algorithmic systems. Essential pre-requisites against abdicating responsibilities”. Computer Law and Security review (on-going publication).

“Building a Better Mobile App Marketplace: An Ethical and Legal Toolkit for App Mediated Genomics Research”. Computer Law and Security review (on-going publication).


Conference Proceedings:

Malgieri, G. The concept of fairness in the GDPR: a linguistic and contextual interpretation. Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 2020 DOI: 10.1145/3351095.3372868

Margot E. Kaminski, Malgieri, G. Multi-layered explanations from algorithmic impact assessments in the GDPR. Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 2020, Page(s) 68-79 DOI: 10.1145/3351095.3372875


Iñigo de Miguel, Ricardo de Lorenzo y Aparici, Lefevre, Claves Prácticas. Datos Genéticos y Relativos a la Salud, (126 pages). Lefevre, Madrid, 2020 SBN: 978-84-18405-29-7.


P. Bruegger, B., Towards a Better Understanding of Identification, Pseudonymization, and Anonymization. Unabhängiges Landeszentrum für Datenschutz (2021).

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 788039.

Disclaimer excluding the EU Agency responsibility: these articles reflect only the authors’ views and the Agency is not responsible for any use that may be made of the information it contains.